Interim Safety Analysis or Re-Screening [Design Issues]

posted by drgunasakaran1  – 2025-01-10 01:01 (186 d 07:51 ago) – Posting: # 24337
Views: 1,860

❝ We are planning to conduct a bioequivalence study for submission in Egypt. The molecules of interest necessitate a washout period of approximately three months in a crossover design. Should we perform re-screening/interim safety analysis before the dosing of Period II?


For Studies on drugs with long elimination half-lives, Egyptian guideline for conducting bioequivalence studies for marketing authorization of generic products states that "Normally the interval between study days should not exceed 3 – 4 weeks." I recommend opting for a parallel design instead of a crossover design with a washout period of three months. This approach will also eliminate the need for re-screening.


Reference: Egyptian Drug Authority, Central Administration of Pharmaceutical Products. Egyptian Guidelines on Conducting Bioequivalence Studies for Marketing Authorization of Generic Products. Cairo. February 2017. Online.
[Helmut]

Dr Gunasakaran Sambandan MD
Disclaimer: The replies/posts are my personal opinions, and they do not represent my company's views on the same. LinkedIn

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,436 posts in 4,932 threads, 1,677 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5