ICHM13/High risk products [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Mikkabel – Belgium, 2024-11-21 16:26 (209 d 02:34 ago) – Posting: # 24288
Views: 3,252

Thanks Ohlbe for your advice!

I can understand the potential lack of efficacy if the treatment is taken off label by the patient.
Just for my information, what would be the expectation of the regulators if after having performed the study in fasted state, the test product present an higher BA (but still less than in fed condition) than the comparator demonstrating a less food effect from the test product? Do you think that it will be an issue for the assessor that the BE is not demonstrated in both condition in that case?


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Truth and clarity are complementary.    Niels Bohr

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5