ISR [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Loky do – Egypt, 2024-11-21 13:04 (60 d 17:53 ago) – Posting: # 24285
Views: 1,264

Hello dears,

I am seeking advice on the best approach to address an Incurred Sample Reanalysis (ISR) trend failure in a bioanalytical study conducted over two years ago. At the time, we adhered to EMA guidelines, which did not require a detailed investigation of ISR trend failures. The ISR trend failure occurred in Period 2 for 6 out of 16 volunteers in this two-period study.

The study was completed, submitted to various regulatory authorities, and accepted; subsequently, the study samples were disposed of.

Recently, a new regulatory authority requested an investigation into this ISR trend failure in alignment with the updated M10 Bio­ana­ly­ti­cal Method Validation guidelines. They also requested sensitivity testing excluding the affected volunteers, and the study passed under these conditions.

We have initiated the investigation but would appreciate guidance on the recommended steps and actions to address this situation effectively.

Thanks in advance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,363 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,677 registered users;
150 visitors (0 registered, 150 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:57 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The combination of some data and an aching desire
for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer
can be extracted from a given body of data.    John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5