Question about computing 90% CI w data from 2 separate studies [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by dshah  – India, 2024-10-15 08:11 (57 d 06:01 ago) – Posting: # 24232
Views: 1,101

Hi BEQool!

❝ Just courious, do you most of the time get the same Ratio if you repeat the study with the same lot of Test and Reference? Additionally, what is for you a "different" or the "same" ratio"? How small/big does the difference has to be that you say there is a difference in ratio? :-)


The reason for asking the ratio was- I am not getting purpose of such exercise. If power is insufficient, then easiest is bootstrapping or modelling. Generally, the ratio should not change much if the power of study was good. So asked for difference in ratio of two studies.

Divyen

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,336 posts in 4,902 threads, 1,665 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:12 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5