First Point Cmax (also ICH M13A) [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-09-17 10:38 (20 d 03:21 ago) – Posting: # 24200
Views: 590

Hi NK,

❝ In our BE study, We observed Cmax at 0.25 hours (15 minutes) which is our first post dose time point.

❝ Do we need to exclude those subjects with Cmax at 15 min for statistical analysis?

According to the FDA’s guidance of August 2012 you quoted, yes. Note that the first paragraph of “Section V.C.” states:

The first point of a concentration-time curve in a BE study, based on blood or plasma measurements, is sometimes the highest point, which raises questions of bias in the estimation of Cmax because of insufficient early sampling times. A carefully conducted pilot study can enable an applicant to avoid this problem.

Did you perform a pilot study or were you fishing in the dark? With a pilot study you would have an argument.
You may provide the complete data as a sensitivity analysis, though I strongly doubt that the FDA will give much – if any – weight to it, especially without a pilot where no first point Cmax was observed.

The ICH M13A is only a little bit more permissive in “Section 2.1.8.1”.

The sampling schedule should include frequent sampling around the anticipated tmax to provide a reliable estimate of Cmax. In particular, the occurrence of Cmax at the first post-dose sampling time point should be avoided by careful consideration of the known PK properties of the drug and selection of a suitable early sampling schedule. For example, for drug products with rapid absorption, collection of blood samples at an early time point, between 5 and 15 minutes after dosing, followed by additional sample collections, e.g., two to five samples in the first hour after dosing, is usually sufficient to assess peak drug concentrations. When absorption is rapid, time points earlier than 5 minutes are generally not expected.
For subjects where Cmax occurs at the first post-dose sampling time, the actual Cmax may have been missed as it could have occurred at an earlier time point. When this occurs, the robustness of the study results in relation to the potential missed Cmax should be discussed. This could include additional analysis where data from the affected subjects are removed from the analysis.

In other words, it is the other way around than for the FDA. Keep the subject(s) in the primary analysis and exclude them in a sensitivity analysis.

❝ To avoid exclusion of subject for statistical analysis, do we need to keep first point "at 15 minutes" or "between 5 and 15 minutes eg. 10 minutes"?

What do you mean by that? You wrote that

❝ … (15 minutes) which is our first post dose time point.


❝ Is it applicable for modified Release product also?

For the FDA, yes. ICH M13A deals only with IR products. However, a first point Cmax at 15 minutes is unlikely for MR products.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,247 posts in 4,885 threads, 1,652 registered users;
81 visitors (0 registered, 81 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5