ƒ of IV = 1 by definition, but… [Off Topic]
❝ According to the guideline, …
❝ […] if two formulation are both intravenous formulation, should I call is absolute BA study or relative BA study?
Bioequivalence studies are generally not required if the test product is to be administered as an aqueous intravenous solution containing the same active substance as the currently approved product. However, if any excipients interact with the drug substance (e.g. complex formation), or otherwise affect the disposition of the drug substance, a bioequivalence study is required unless both products contain the same excipients in very similar quantity and it can be adequately justified that any difference in quantity does not affect the pharmacokinetics of the active substance.
If the conditions for waiving are not applicable, call it a comparative BA study.- <nitpick>
- »Bioequivalence study« is a misnomer. Bioequivalence is the desired result of a comparative biovailability study.
Only Health Canada consistently uses ‘comparative BA’. See also the funky footnote in this article.
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- A boring question about bioavailability? Darborn 2024-08-01 09:05 [Off Topic]
- ƒ of IV = 1 by definition, but…Helmut 2024-08-01 12:05
- ƒ of IV = 1 by definition, but… Darborn 2024-08-01 12:36
- IV: Different half-lives? Helmut 2024-08-01 13:43
- IV: Different half-lives? Darborn 2024-08-02 02:39
- IV: Liposome encapsuled drug, pegylated biologic? Helmut 2024-08-02 07:52
- IV: Liposome encapsuled drug, pegylated biologic? Darborn 2024-08-06 05:15
- IV: Liposome encapsuled drug, pegylated biologic? Helmut 2024-08-02 07:52
- IV: Different half-lives? Darborn 2024-08-02 02:39
- IV: Different half-lives? Helmut 2024-08-01 13:43
- ƒ of IV = 1 by definition, but… Darborn 2024-08-01 12:36
- ƒ of IV = 1 by definition, but…Helmut 2024-08-01 12:05