🇦🇹 AGES [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-07-24 13:16 (355 d 20:11 ago) – Posting: # 24097
Views: 3,468

Hi Mittyri,

oh dear!

The presence of period, sequence, and treatment effects were evaluated.

Why the heck?

For AUC0-t, a significant treatment effect was observed for ASA (p = 0.0221).

So what?

The lower and upper limit of the CI was below 100% …

A consequence of p < 0.05.

… but within the lower limit of the acceptance range of 80.00[%]

Again: So what?
Similar nonsense for SA.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,436 posts in 4,932 threads, 1,677 registered users;
56 visitors (1 registered, 55 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design.    Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5