Phoenix Win­Non­lin vs Power­TOST [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-05-29 11:39 (404 d 10:57 ago) – Posting: # 24008
Views: 4,118

Hi Jietian,

❝ I got a problem related to the CV% (from a parallel BE) and confidence interval. The CV% from winnonlin is ~14% but confidence interval is 74%-136%. Although the sample size for this trial is rather small (19 for analysis), the calculated CV% using confidence interval in PowerTOST is quite large (~39%). I'm not sure why the result is counterintuitive.

Confirmed the result from PowerTOST:

library(PowerTOST)
cat(paste0("CV (total) ~",
    signif(100 * CI2CV(lower = 0.74, upper = 1.36,
                        n = 19, design = "parallel"), 2), "%\n"))

Unbalanced parallel design. n(i)= 10/9 assumed.
CV (total) ~39%


❝ Anyone have ideas?

Can you please post your data, the version of Phoenix, and the model specifications?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,686 registered users;
78 visitors (0 registered, 78 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5