Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • n=180 4-period full replicate

n=180 4-period full replicate [Design Issues]

posted by Achievwin – US, 2024-05-17 15:45 (398 d 14:53 ago) – Posting: # 24000
Views: 4,199

❝ there is clear requirement to improve T/R ratio from 0.85 to at least 0.9 -

that is commonsense if you ask a BE guy..... then formulators show 100s for documents that the formulations compare "Spot on" then starts navigation through muddy waters.

Complete thread:

Large sample size in a BE study Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:28 [Design Issues]
- My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 13:34
  - My record: ≈400 Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:49
    - My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 14:19
  - My record: ≈400 nobody 2024-05-03 18:44
    - n=180 4-period full replicate Helmut 2024-05-03 22:25
      - n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-06 15:56
        
        HVNTID! mittyri 2024-05-07 07:35
      - n=180 4-period full replicate dshah 2024-05-08 16:11
        
        Lousy T/R-ratio Helmut 2024-05-08 16:18
        n=180 4-period full replicateAchievwin 2024-05-17 13:45