Lousy T/R-ratio [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-05-08 18:18 (12 d 11:06 ago) – Posting: # 23993
Views: 659

Hi Divyen,

❝ According to me, there is clear requirement to improve T/R ratio from 0.85 to at least 0.9 which can reduce the sample size as well.

I agree, of course, but see above. The company tried, but to no avail. I don’t remember how many times reformulation was done – always followed by a pilot study. It was not possible to do it better…

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,033 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,647 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections.
You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.    Vilfredo Pareto

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5