n=180 4-period full replicate [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-05-04 00:25 (17 d 05:40 ago) – Posting: # 23983
Views: 903

Hi nobody,

❝ ❝ BTW, I have seen 4-period full replicate studies with 180 healthy volunteers…

❝ Photos or it didn't happen. At least intraind CV :-P

Incidentally I know the backstory of #1 of the post above. It was very difficult to develop a new formulation. Pilot studies (plural!) with 80 subjects. No reference-scaling; however, CV was not the main problem. Sample size based on a best-guess T/R-ratio of 0.85. Do the maths.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,033 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,647 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections.
You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.    Vilfredo Pareto

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz