Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • My record: ≈400

My record: ≈400 [Design Issues]

posted by nobody – 2024-05-03 20:44 (323 d 02:52 ago) – Posting: # 23982
Views: 4,009

❝ Define magnitude. :-D If you mean hundreds, yes. Multi-center in patients.

❝ BTW, I have seen 4-period full replicate studies with 180 healthy volunteers…

Photos or it didn't happen. At least intraind CV :-P

:-P

—
Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Large sample size in a BE study Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:28 [Design Issues]
- My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 13:34
  - My record: ≈400 Achievwin 2024-05-03 13:49
    - My record: ≈400 Helmut 2024-05-03 14:19
  - My record: ≈400nobody 2024-05-03 18:44
    - n=180 4-period full replicate Helmut 2024-05-03 22:25
      - n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-06 15:56
        
        HVNTID! mittyri 2024-05-07 07:35
      - n=180 4-period full replicate dshah 2024-05-08 16:11
        
        Lousy T/R-ratio Helmut 2024-05-08 16:18
        n=180 4-period full replicate Achievwin 2024-05-17 13:45

Admin contact
23,409 posts in 4,921 threads, 1,670 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:37 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true! Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz