OT [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-05-01 22:42 (47 d 20:02 ago) – Posting: # 23973
Views: 3,052

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ […] And then we got guidance that was […] solving a hypothetical problem in such a way that it was all but impractical for an applicant to plan and dimension a study.

Reminds me on Individual / Population Bioequivalence, which was regarded* a

‘theoretical’ solution to a ‘thoretical’ problem.

BTW, at the GBHI-2024 in April I tried to squeeze information from the FDA’s participants about DABERS (Data Anomalies in Bio­Equi­va­lence R Shiny). Nada.
Edit: Same at the SAAMnow Spring Work­shop on Data Inte­grity in BE Stu­dies in June.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,057 posts in 4,840 threads, 1,641 registered users;
123 visitors (0 registered, 123 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You should treat as many patients as possible with the new drugs
while they still have the power to heal.    Armand Trousseau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz