OT [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2024-05-01 22:42 (138 d 06:52 ago) – Posting: # 23973
Views: 5,086

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ […] And then we got guidance that was […] solving a hypothetical problem in such a way that it was all but impractical for an applicant to plan and dimension a study.


Reminds me on Individual / Population Bioequivalence, which was regarded* a

‘theoretical’ solution to a ‘thoretical’ problem.


BTW, at the GBHI-2024 in April I tried to squeeze information from the FDA’s participants about DABERS (Data Anomalies in Bio­Equi­va­lence R Shiny). Nada.
Edit: Same at the SAAMnow Spring Work­shop on Data Inte­grity in BE Stu­dies in June.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,225 posts in 4,879 threads, 1,654 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real purpose of the scientific method is to make sure
nature hasn’t misled you into thinking you know something
you actually don’t know.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5