Truncated AUC [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Rajinikanth.S – India, 2024-03-20 09:41 (473 d 17:20 ago) – Posting: # 23912
Views: 3,615

Dear All,

If a subject(s) misses the last sampling point or few sampling time points before the 72 hours for a Treatment(s) then the AUC0-72/48/96 etc. hours parameter will be excluded for that Treatment(s) for that subject(s). If study involves measuring multiple analytes, the concept would be applied only to relevant analyte which is responsible for truncating the sample collection to 72 hours. Whenever there is no possibility to compare both Test and Reference formulations for AUC0-72 [e.g.: the issue of missing sample(s) exists in one of the Treatment(s) only], AUC0-72 of such subject(s) will be excluded for both treatments from the pharmacokinetic analysis and this scenario is mostly applicable for two way cross-over design.

Is it reliable statement, Plz confirm.


Edit: Category changed and subject line changed; see also this post #1 and #2[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,678 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5