Log in
RegisterSubject effect justification [General Statistics]
Dear Dafni_C.
Just for clarification of the background.
You conducted an ANOVA (or mixed effects model) with the effects "treatment", "sequence" and "period" as well as the effect "subject(sequence)"?
And in your "ANOVA"-table the p-value of "subject(sequence)" was found to be statistically significant?
There are more qualified persons here, but ...
this indicates that the subjects in the trial were different people, so that normally would be expected to be "significant", right?
If you mean the "sequence" effect or something else, you may find the information available in the "Articles" (see header at the very top) helpful.
Best regards!
Just for clarification of the background.
You conducted an ANOVA (or mixed effects model) with the effects "treatment", "sequence" and "period" as well as the effect "subject(sequence)"?
And in your "ANOVA"-table the p-value of "subject(sequence)" was found to be statistically significant?
There are more qualified persons here, but ...
this indicates that the subjects in the trial were different people, so that normally would be expected to be "significant", right?
If you mean the "sequence" effect or something else, you may find the information available in the "Articles" (see header at the very top) helpful.
Best regards!
Complete thread:
- Subject effect justification Dafni_C 2024-01-17 10:00 [General Statistics]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Subject effect justificationRelaxation 2024-01-17 12:30
Ing. Helmut Schütz