Don’t include tmax [NCA / SHAM]

posted by ryraman2661 – India, 2023-12-26 09:40 (485 d 07:43 ago) – Posting: # 23810
Views: 2,782

Dear Helmut,

Thanks for your reply on tmax.

In one study, we have drawn samples up to 96.00 hrs post dose. we have stated only Cmax and AUC(0 to t) as primary parameters for bioequivalence in our protocol. We have, mentioned AUC(0 to inf) as secondary parameter. Sponsor wants AUC also to be tested for BE criteria. Our statistician says, if we include tmax points for some subjects, it is passing. Shall we submit the AUC(0 to inf) data, (including tmax)?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5