Exclude the subject(s) [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-07-02 16:15 (377 d 01:40 ago) – Posting: # 23646
Views: 2,017

Hi Imph

❝ can you please enlighten me on the most accepted way to handle missing points around tmax?


Sorry, cards are stacked against you. I tried a lot with data imputation by PK modeling in the past, but nothing was accepted by agencies. However, if that doesn’t happen in many subjects, the loss in power when you exclude the subject(s) is generally not large (unless the number of eligible subjects becomes really small).

Examples:

library(PowerTOST)
# 2x2x2 design defaults: T/R 0.9, target power 0.8
excl <- 0.05 # fraction of excluded subjects
CV   <- seq(0.15, 0.35 0.05)
x    <- data.frame(CV = CV, n = NA_integer_, power = NA_real_,
                   elig = NA_real_, pow.elig = NA_real_, loss = NA_real_)
for (j in 1:nrow(x)) {
  tmp           <- sampleN.TOST(CV = CV[j], print = FALSE)
  x$n[j]        <- tmp[["Sample size"]]
  x$power[j]    <- tmp[["Achieved power"]]
  x$elig[j]     <- floor(x$n[j] * (1- excl))
  x$pow.elig[j] <- suppressMessages(power.TOST(CV = CV[j], n = x$elig[j]))
  x$loss[j]     <- 100 * (1 - x$pow.elig[j] / x$power[j])
}
names(x)[4:6] <- c("eligibe", "power", "loss (%)")
print(signif(x, 4), row.names = FALSE)

   CV  n  power eligibe  power loss (%)
 0.15 12 0.8305      11 0.7877    5.150
 0.20 20 0.8347      19 0.8132    2.569
 0.25 28 0.8074      26 0.7761    3.887
 0.30 40 0.8158      38 0.7953    2.515
 0.35 52 0.8075      49 0.7831    3.017


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,099 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,646 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded
if you tied them the usual way.
This happens to us all the time with computers,
and nobody thinks of complaining.    Jef Raskin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5