tmax ≠ Cmax 🙂 [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-06-27 19:03 (661 d 05:33 ago) – Posting: # 23629
Views: 3,158

Hi Imph,

❝ In the WinNonlin guide, this is how tmax is defined:


❝ Tmax: Time of maximum observed concentration. For non-steady-state data, the entire curve is considered. If the maximum observed concentration is not unique, then the first maximum is used


Sure, but you were talking about Cmax – not tmax. That’s how it is implemented in all software I know.
During a training a smart-ass said “That’s all wrong! If there are identical maxima, tmax should be reported as the median of observed times.” I think that’s a rather academic question. How likely is it to have exactly (‼) the same concentrations?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,709 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not worry about your difficulties in mathematics.
I can assure you mine are still greater.    Albert Einstein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5