Which software? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-06-27 17:24 (360 d 07:42 ago) – Posting: # 23627
Views: 1,598

Hi Imph,

❝ ❝ Read what Divyen stated above again. By definiton the highest concentration! :-D


❝ yes logically, the issue is that I have read that some softwares systematically take the first peak to define the cmax.


Which one? I’ve tested 17 (both commercial an open-source). Would be crazy!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,663 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5