Which software? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-06-27 17:24 (678 d 20:57 ago) – Posting: # 23627
Views: 3,258

Hi Imph,

❝ ❝ Read what Divyen stated above again. By definiton the highest concentration! :-D


❝ yes logically, the issue is that I have read that some softwares systematically take the first peak to define the cmax.


Which one? I’ve tested 17 (both commercial an open-source). Would be crazy!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
67 visitors (0 registered, 67 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s always fun to have your models validated,
but is way more fun to have them trashed.
Finding out you are completely wrong
is a great part of science.    G. Randall Gladstone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5