FDA: TRT|RTR instead of TRR|RTR|RRT? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-06-07 12:22 (587 d 15:01 ago) – Posting: # 23579
Views: 1,973

Hi Brus,

❝ But nothing is said about the option full-replicate 3-ways, 2-sequences: TRT / RTR,……

Stupid enough. We may run into trouble if we have to assess the study in a partial replicate design for ABE because \(\small{s_\text{wR} < 0.294}\). See this article. At a webinar in March 2023 I tried to ask Donald Schuirmann.
The 👨‍✈️ steering moderating the »Panel Dis­cus­sions« decided to ignore my question… Instead, the only question related to SABE was “How is a Highly Variable Drug defined?”, which Donald explained at great length. Oh dear, what a waste of time!

❝ … which does seem to be included in the guideline Statistical Approaches to Establishing Bio­equi­valence.

Pragmatic: This one is the newest one. ;-)

❝ Does this mean that this design can no longer be used?

I don’t see any reason for not doing so. Why should we use an inferior method in lieu of a better one? If in doubt, initiate a controlled correspondence with the [image].

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,362 posts in 4,906 threads, 1,673 registered users;
103 visitors (0 registered, 103 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:23 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I have not failed 700 times. I have not failed once.
I have succeeded in proving
that those 700 ways will not work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5