Sample Size Benefits of Replicate Design with ABE [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Sereng  – USA, 2023-05-24 17:41 (394 d 01:13 ago) – Posting: # 23566
Views: 1,750

Folks, I have three questions:

(1) If you conduct a full replicate crossover design BE study (T x 2, R x 2, e.g., TRTR|RTRT) is there any sample size efficiency (fewer patients required) with ABE analysis or is it no different (in terms of sample size) than a non-replicate crossover design BE study (T x1, R x 1) with ABE analysis.

(2) For demonstrably HVD (WSV >30%), why do some product specific guidance for ANDA suggest (or allow) full replicate designs and others do not mention this approach?

(3) For demonstrably HVD (WSV >30%), why do some Clinical Divisions object to use of full replicate design studies in 505(b)(2) NDAs?

Any input would be appreciated!

Biostatistically Challenged CEO

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,059 posts in 4,841 threads, 1,665 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5