Variable names, lexical order? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by weiguo2122 – 2023-04-21 16:15 (451 d 12:13 ago) – Posting: # 23534
Views: 1,862

❝ 74.02% (90% CI: 65.69–83.41%) is correct. Confirmed in Phoenix/WinNonlin, R, and ‘manually’ in a spreadsheet. See BEQool’s post above for the likely explanation.

❝ I don’t speak SAS; try to remove to dollar-characters from the headers in your data statement.


Thanks all for your replying.

1. I accidentally put "weiguo2122$2gmail.com" as my username, now it is hard to make a change because "edit profile" do not allow me make change". If possible, please change my username as "Weiguo21224" at your end.

2. I carefully reviewed previous discussion. My understanding is that "T" and "R" in FDA code do represent the "Test drug" and "Reference drug" respectively. It should be:

ESTIMATE 'T (the large/later one in lexical order, Reference drug) vs. R (the small/early one in lexical order, Test drug') TRT 1 -1/CL ALPHA=0.1;

Right?

Best!

David


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,101 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,644 registered users;
83 visitors (0 registered, 83 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One can show the following: given any rule, however “fundamental”
or “necessary” for science, there are always circumstances
when it is advisable not only to ignore the rule,
but to adopt its opposite.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5