Definition of Full Replicate [Design Issues]

posted by Sereng  – USA, 2023-03-14 00:38 (570 d 09:05 ago) – Posting: # 23496
Views: 4,088

Hi Mahmoud, thank you for your response. I think you may have misunderstood my question. I have always understood a "full replicate" design to be one where each treatment condition is repeated twice. Therefore, if the Test was being compared with Reference in the fasted state, a full replicate would involve giving both the Test and Reference on two occasions. Is this correct? Furthermore, calling a four-way fed fasted crossover study (Test Fed & Fasted, and Ref Fed & fasted), each given once a Full Replicate study would be wrong. is this correct?

Biostatistically Challenged CEO

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,240 posts in 4,884 threads, 1,652 registered users;
59 visitors (0 registered, 59 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

[The] impatience with ambiguity can be criticized in the phrase:
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5