SAP vs. part of the clinical protocol [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Sereng  – USA, 2023-02-11 00:34 (807 d 10:30 ago) – Posting: # 23454
Views: 3,584

Hi Helmut, I am not sure whether my reply should be at the top or bottom in this forum. Many thanks for your response. Do you include your BA/BE study SAP with you NDA? Regards

❝ […] whatever format is used (SAP or planned statistics as part of the clinical protocol) it must be detailed enough to enable assessors/inspectors to unambiguously reproduce results with given data.


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Helmut]
—
Biostatistically Challenged CEO

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
82 visitors (0 registered, 82 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5