SAP vs. part of the clinical protocol [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-02-09 10:49 (439 d 09:32 ago) – Posting: # 23448
Views: 2,071

Hi Sereng,

❝ My CRO states that no "standalone" Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) is required and that the statistical analysis in the protocol should suffice.


Why not? Was accepted in 400 of my studies. Then I opted for a separate SAP.

❝ However, the information in the protocol does not capture everything I would ordinarily expect to be in the SAP and I am not comfortable with the CRO's response.


What would you ordinarily expect?

❝ Is a (detailed) SAP required (or recommended), particularly where the entire NDA will be predicated on its findings?


No. However, whatever format is used (SAP or planned statistics as part of the clinical protocol) it must be detailed enough to enable assessors/inspectors to unambiguously reproduce results with given data.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,652 registered users;
58 visitors (1 registered, 57 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5