SAP vs. part of the clinical protocol [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2023-02-09 10:49 (441 d 05:12 ago) – Posting: # 23448
Views: 2,083

Hi Sereng,

❝ My CRO states that no "standalone" Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) is required and that the statistical analysis in the protocol should suffice.


Why not? Was accepted in 400 of my studies. Then I opted for a separate SAP.

❝ However, the information in the protocol does not capture everything I would ordinarily expect to be in the SAP and I am not comfortable with the CRO's response.


What would you ordinarily expect?

❝ Is a (detailed) SAP required (or recommended), particularly where the entire NDA will be predicated on its findings?


No. However, whatever format is used (SAP or planned statistics as part of the clinical protocol) it must be detailed enough to enable assessors/inspectors to unambiguously reproduce results with given data.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,651 registered users;
105 visitors (0 registered, 105 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5