Study Design: Two treatment or Four treatment [Design Issues]

posted by NK – India, 2023-01-24 04:37 (538 d 23:45 ago) – Posting: # 23436
Views: 2,151

❝ How are you going to access the BE? Are you comparing Test fasting vs Ref fasting/Ref Fed/ Test fed and similar or it is only Test fast vs Ref Fast, Test fed vs Ref fed?


Hi Divyen,

In this case we will be comparing Test fast vs Ref Fast, Test fed vs Ref fed.

Similarly, in other scenario three arm study (Test fast, Ref Fast and Ref fed) with two treatments (Test and Reference) comparing Test fast vs Ref Fast, Test fed vs Ref fast. what will be appropriate treatment ( Two treatment or three treatment) to be mentioned in the title of the study.

Regards
NK


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,101 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,644 registered users;
62 visitors (0 registered, 62 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One can show the following: given any rule, however “fundamental”
or “necessary” for science, there are always circumstances
when it is advisable not only to ignore the rule,
but to adopt its opposite.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5