Study Design: Two treatment or Four treatment [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2023-01-23 16:05 (602 d 23:59 ago) – Posting: # 23434
Views: 2,433

Hi NK

❝ We are planning a BE study with four arms (Test product under fasting, Test product under fed, Reference under fasting & Reference under fed) with two treatments (test and Reference). In this case, please clarify the study title to be mentioned as "Two treatment, Two sequence" or "Four treatment, two sequence" Bioequivalence study?


You can call it something like "a two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence randomised BE study in two cohorts (fed and fasted) to investigate similarity in rate and extent of absorption of Blahblah vs Blahblahblah in healthy adult volunteers."

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,226 posts in 4,879 threads, 1,657 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real purpose of the scientific method is to make sure
nature hasn’t misled you into thinking you know something
you actually don’t know.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5