SxF [BE/BA News]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2022-12-04 07:34 (597 d 09:06 ago) – Posting: # 23385
Views: 6,617

Hi all,

the new draft is interesting and I am still digesting it.

I see that the SxF interaction is given some consideration here, but I am not sure what is meant now. One thing is the outlier aspect and that is ok (Line 387 etc). But it enters the scene again in Line 478 and that part is not so clear. As you read it, do they recommend estimation of SxF whenever the design allows? What do we do with the info?

Muchas gracias.

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,119 posts in 4,859 threads, 1,647 registered users;
38 visitors (1 registered, 37 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t really say “similar” if it’s the same again you want.
“Similar” means something different.    Anthony Burgess

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz