It's all in the df's [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2022-11-18 18:28 (465 d 01:13 ago) – Posting: # 23372
Views: 2,043

Hi again,

stating the entire thread in fewer terms and no code: more df's = better (more precise) estimates.
You can increase the df's in two ways:
  1. Betweens: More subjects
  2. Withins: More treatments (or, if you will, treatment periods) per subject
Both will work, but which one works best in any given circumstance depends on the details of the problem at hand.


Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,635 registered users;
26 visitors (0 registered, 26 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:41 CET (Europe/Vienna)

[…] an inappropriate study design is incapable of answering
a research question, no matter how careful the subsequent
methodology, conduct, analysis, and interpretation:
Flawless execution of a flawed design achieves nothing worthwhile.    J. Rick Turner

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz