US (or EU) ANDA: Fail f2 but pass BE? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2022-09-02 02:29 (543 d 16:21 ago) – Posting: # 23260
Views: 2,780

Thanks Osama.

That's my thinking as well since the BE studies were ~ 100% in ratios and reasonably sized.
But explaining to those non-pk/bioparm management f**ls who keep asking for risk assessment BS is a challenge.

❝ What about if you start with sampling time points @ 10 min ( EMA) and not @ 5min ( FDA)?

❝ have you tried with bootstrapping to overcome the high variability in the early sampling time points?


Unfortunately the guidance asked for 5 and 10 mins and on... evaluating the data now to see if there is need to evaluate..

john

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,636 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:50 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5