Randomization for withdrawals / stand-by subjects [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2022-08-22 11:36 (1043 d 12:47 ago) – Posting: # 23226
Views: 3,701

Hi neilfiona,

in my old CRO we had exactly your procedure and it was never a problem in CGP inspections. There is only a cosmetic issue, namely that you have ‘holes’ in the subject numbers. But you will face the same with dropouts during the study.

In other CROs subjects are assigned to the randomization once it is known who will agree to participate. Then you don’t have to create a randomization larger than the planned sample size. Acceptable as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,425 posts in 4,928 threads, 1,680 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I think it is much more interesting to live with uncertainty
than to live with answers that might be wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5