in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (805 d 21:46 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 2,642

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.


Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.


❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.


Thank you.

Regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,249 posts in 4,885 threads, 1,652 registered users;
70 visitors (0 registered, 70 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shocks me. I’m a scientist.    Harrison Ford (as Indiana Jones)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5