in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (1080 d 11:04 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 4,237

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.


Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.


❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.


Thank you.

Regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,691 registered users;
31 visitors (0 registered, 31 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5