in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (631 d 12:24 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 1,864

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.

Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.

❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.

Thank you.


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,653 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz