in vivo ≠ in vitro [Power / Sample Size]

posted by Mithu – India, 2022-07-25 15:26 (634 d 19:24 ago) – Posting: # 23175
Views: 1,876

❝ As per regulatory acceptance- it is either acceptable or unacceptable. So is not best to describe it as marginally acceptable.


Just to make it clear that I am trying to say that study is passing at 80.5% lower CI.

❝ The in vitro assessment with recent batches of reference is important and also performing a comparative dissolution with older lot (if still available) can be useful.


❝ Taking only larger size without consideration of in vitro assessment will not solve your problem.


Thank you.

Regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,658 registered users;
105 visitors (0 registered, 105 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The whole purpose of education is
to turn mirrors into windows.    Sydney J. Harris

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5