Evaluation of Matrix effect [Bioanalytics]
Dear Members
This is with regard to ICH M10 guideline
For Matrix effect, it is mentioned as “should be evaluated by analysing at least 3 replicates of low and high QCs, each prepared using matrix from at least 6 different sources/lots. For each individual matrix sources/lots evaluated, the accuracy should be within ±15% of the nominal concentration and the precision (per cent coefficient of variation (%CV)) should not be greater than 15%”
To comply with M10 guideline, for checking accuracy is it necessary to have calibration standards in matrix factor experiment?
Matrix factor, Our practice is to compare post extracted spiked sample vs aqueous sample, acceptance criteria is CV for matrix factor and IS normalised matrix factor should be ≤ 15%
Please opine.
Thanks & regards,
Avinash
Edit: category changed [Ohlbe]
This is with regard to ICH M10 guideline
For Matrix effect, it is mentioned as “should be evaluated by analysing at least 3 replicates of low and high QCs, each prepared using matrix from at least 6 different sources/lots. For each individual matrix sources/lots evaluated, the accuracy should be within ±15% of the nominal concentration and the precision (per cent coefficient of variation (%CV)) should not be greater than 15%”
To comply with M10 guideline, for checking accuracy is it necessary to have calibration standards in matrix factor experiment?
Matrix factor, Our practice is to compare post extracted spiked sample vs aqueous sample, acceptance criteria is CV for matrix factor and IS normalised matrix factor should be ≤ 15%
Please opine.
Thanks & regards,
Avinash
Edit: category changed [Ohlbe]
Complete thread:
- Evaluation of Matrix effectavinash 2022-07-06 07:04 [Bioanalytics]
- Evaluation of Matrix effect Ohlbe 2022-07-06 10:18
- Evaluation of Matrix effect avinash 2022-07-06 10:35
- Evaluation of Matrix effect Ohlbe 2022-07-06 10:18