Rivaroxaban: FDA and others [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2022-07-04 15:19 (1040 d 19:08 ago) – Posting: # 23104
Views: 3,201

Hi Tricky,

❝ Is it possible to go with Single-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover study design?


It depends on the ‘target’ agency. For the FDA and China’s CDE no way because you have to compare the within-subject variability of test and reference. That requires a full replicate design. For details see the warfarin-guidance (ignore the part about reference-scaling; for rivaroxaban the conventional limits of 80.00–125.00% are applicable).

For all other agencies a 2×2×2 likely would do. In the EMA’s product-specific guidance no design is mentioned. However, riva­roxaban may show high variability, esp. in fed state. Be prepared for large sample sizes.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
92 visitors (0 registered, 92 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We should not speak so that it is possible
for the audience to understand us,
but so that it is impossible
for them to misunderstand us.    Quintilian

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5