Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-06-27 15:45 (610 d 20:49 ago) – Posting: # 23093
Views: 1,700

Hi ElMaestro,

some more questions

❝ Your type I error is not depending on your estimates and thus not depending on whether you went into stage 2 or not.

OK, what about this:
power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.2, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.0511

power.tsd(method = "C", CV = 0.3, n1 = 12, theta0 = 1.25)

p(BE)    = 0.043743

So T1E (OK, maximum type I error) depends on the CV, isn't it?
Or may be I misunderstood your point and we should not verify T1E during estimation process since we are assuming that the framework was stated as acceptable in the Protocol?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,637 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:34 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Exploratory analysis: The art of finding a Rembrandt
in a Jackson Pollock.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz