Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-06-26 01:29 (665 d 14:30 ago) – Posting: # 23087
Views: 2,078

Hi Helmut (and ElMaestro - sorry to post in this thread, but all your answers are great!),

❝ Of course, ElMaestro is right.

There Can Be Only One.

OK, I understand the logic here.
take a look at some (theoretical) situation: a Sponsor goes with Potvin C (don't ask me why), moreover, he proved that with the current CV and n1 T1E does not exceed 5%.
But as you showed in the lectures and in example above, Potvin C could not ensure 5% for all combinations. Thus, during stage 1 the CV was lower and the resulted T1E was out of 5%.
What would be the right (safe) way out in such situation?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,649 registered users;
32 visitors (0 registered, 32 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

As soon as we abandon our own reason, and are content
to rely upon authority, there is no end to our troubles.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz