Potvin C consequences [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-06-26 01:29 (612 d 20:52 ago) – Posting: # 23087
Views: 1,807

Hi Helmut (and ElMaestro - sorry to post in this thread, but all your answers are great!),

❝ Of course, ElMaestro is right.

There Can Be Only One.

OK, I understand the logic here.
take a look at some (theoretical) situation: a Sponsor goes with Potvin C (don't ask me why), moreover, he proved that with the current CV and n1 T1E does not exceed 5%.
But as you showed in the lectures and in example above, Potvin C could not ensure 5% for all combinations. Thus, during stage 1 the CV was lower and the resulted T1E was out of 5%.
What would be the right (safe) way out in such situation?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,639 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:22 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Exploratory analysis: The art of finding a Rembrandt
in a Jackson Pollock.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz