Retraction [Off Topic]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2022-06-16 19:52 (357 d 19:54 ago) – Posting: # 23065
Views: 1,567

Hi Hötzi,

what a strange story. Thanks for posting.

I think there is more to it than meets the eye.
  1. Isn't it a funny term "Integrity of its authorship". Is that the same as integrity of the study or the data? To me it sounds like doubt over who wrote the paper (or didn't) etc.
  2. How can a paper first be published and then, afterwards, someone requires access to raw data and ethics approval?
    And who is someone? The ordinary reader can't ask about such things after publication (or she/he can, but to the best of my knowledge the journal does not make a requirement for publication that the authors provide raw data or other insights to readers upon request).
Strange one.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,627 posts in 4,743 threads, 1,613 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove
anything that’s even remotely true!    Homer Simpson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5