Retraction [Off Topic]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2022-06-16 16:43 (176 d 09:24 ago) – Posting: # 23064
Views: 1,143

Dear all,

sometimes the text in retraction notes1 is funny:

[image]

The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this article.2 After publication, concerns were raised about the integrity of its authorship. The authors were asked for raw data and ethics approval but were unable to supply credible materials. The Editor-in-Chief, therefore, no longer has confidence in the integrity of data in this article.

Corresponding author Xinghua Wang has not stated whether they agree to this retraction notice. None of the other authors responded to any correspondence from the editor about this retraction.



  1. Retraction Note: Bimatoprost-Loaded Silica Shell–Coated Nanoparticles-Laden Soft Contact Lenses to Manage Glaucoma: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. AAPS Pharm Tech. 2022; 23: Article 155. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-022-02306-9.
  2. Xiaojie H, Fagang J, Jun J, Chunfang W, Chengquan L, Xinghua W. Bimatoprost-Loaded Silica Shell–Coated Nanoparticles-Laden Soft Contact Lenses to Manage Glaucoma: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. AAPS Pharm Tech. 2021; 23: 1–9. 10.1208/s12249-021-02199-0.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,436 posts in 4,696 threads, 1,599 registered users;
15 visitors (0 registered, 15 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:08 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It is better to debate a question without settling it
than to settle a question without debating it.    Joseph Joubert

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5