Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-09-02 18:30 (6133 d 12:32 ago) – Posting: # 2306
Views: 24,035

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ I'm not sure I get your point there. In a standard 2x2 cross-over trial, the new version of the guideline would still allow subjects missing one of the two periods to be excluded.


OK. Maybe. If one reads the whole sentence in your interpretation.
In understandable words it would mean "... complete at least two periods ..."
(understandable at least for me :-D ).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5