Sponsors and CRO selection [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2022-05-25 12:53 (782 d 16:00 ago) – Posting: # 23018
Views: 4,531

Dear Helmut and ElMaestro,

❝ Remember GVK Bio back in the day? Doable in a spreadshit.


❝ The data are available to the sponsor and potential buyers of the dossier as well.


Well, remember GVK ? According to the ANSM inspection report (document A3, page 3), the whistleblower said that "the switch", as ElMaestro calls it, was done only for some sponsors, who paid the head of the bioanalytical lab to do it. The report does not mention any evidence being found to support this allegation, but that's indeed a possibility.

Overall:

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,101 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,644 registered users;
77 visitors (0 registered, 77 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One can show the following: given any rule, however “fundamental”
or “necessary” for science, there are always circumstances
when it is advisable not only to ignore the rule,
but to adopt its opposite.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5