S × F interaction [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2022-05-20 17:33 (785 d 00:43 ago) – Posting: # 23008
Views: 2,434

Hi Achievwin,

❝ I vaguely recall when you don't have subject by formulation interaction in a replicate study design (4-period full replicate design???) you can request switchability (Metadate ANDA I guess)

No idea (too lazy to search).

❝ […] can we assess this subject by formulation interaction in a 3-period partial replicate design?) what additional statistical test one needs for documenting this?

Not sure whether it will work. The partial replicate is a nasty beast (for potential problems see there).

IIRC, in the late 1990s concerns about the Subject-by-Formulation interaction emerg­ed. Temporarily studies had to be performed in a replicated design. After assessing the results, the FDA con­cluded that the S × F interaction is practically not relevant and the temporary requirement was lifted.
Furthermore, none of the simulations performed by various authors or by the FDA which lead to RSABE contained an S × F-interaction term in the model.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,099 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,646 registered users;
85 visitors (0 registered, 85 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded
if you tied them the usual way.
This happens to us all the time with computers,
and nobody thinks of complaining.    Jef Raskin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz