residual area < 20% for more than 80% subjects [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2022-05-14 22:06 (12 d 18:33 ago) – Posting: # 22986
Views: 211

Hi Sereng,

» despite best efforts (adequate sampling duration), if you should determine that one or more subjects contributes a large extrapolated AUC (>20%) in a BE study, how should we deal with it?

that's OK if the number of subjects with large residual area is less than 20%
Otherwise the sampling duration is not adequate or there are other issues with formulation/analyte/product

PS: above is true for EMA guide and bound jurisdictions

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,108 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 16:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz