Preliminary simulations [BE/BA News]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2022-04-30 21:10 (667 d 21:01 ago) – Posting: # 22946
Views: 4,089

Hi Hötzi,

your post is potentially highly significant.

❝ Is this really the intention? The wider the range in tmax, the more easily products will pass. Counterintuitive.

The intention, as I understand it, was exactly the opposite. It goes completely against all intention, doesn't it?
I think this knowledge, if it holds in confirmatory simulations, should be published quickly and made available to regulators.

I very much hope that regulators will abstain completely from letting pride prevail over the regard for the EU patient. So I hope they will not dismiss the argumentation. For example, I could fear they would dismiss your findings because they don't have a palate for simulations (but note they like simulations well enough when it comes to f2; bootstrapping is a simulation, too).

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,636 registered users;
22 visitors (0 registered, 22 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:11 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz