BA assessment of Spray vs topical powder [PK / PD]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2022-04-11 20:24 (680 d 06:21 ago) – Posting: # 22929
Views: 1,144

Thanks Dshah,

We are thinking of making a spray to replace a topical powder. Its a locally acting drug with the intent to treat a specific part of the body where the infection occurs. Yes a clinical endpt study is the obvious choice, not to mention that the systemic BA is less than 1%. I was wondering if one can get by without doing a clinical endpt study though, maybe a dermal study? For a dermal study, if the location of treatment is specific, does that mean the dermal study would have to involve the same area of the skin that the treatment is applied to as per reference product label?


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,899 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,652 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:46 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is, or should be, about scientific investigation
and how to do it better, but many statisticians believe
it is a branch of mathematics.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz