Log in
RegisterOT [Power / Sample Size]
Dear Anders,
what a sparkling gem of literature! Kudos
I highly recommend you to change your profession to be a dime novelist or a ghost writer of love letters for scientists, especially such working on the field of bioequivalence or similar nonsens
❝ ...
❝ We started out with the good old work horse, the 222BE design with plain average BE. Great for many things.
❝ But "hey, poor me", said the Sponsor, "now I need 326 subjects in my trial for Schützoycin tablets. I demand an easier approach!".
❝ Then regulators meditated 10 years and held conference all the while and at some point it looked like average BE was being scrapped and fancy things like Pop BE and Individual BE were winning the crowd. But when the smoke had cleared average BE was still standing ...
what a sparkling gem of literature! Kudos
I highly recommend you to change your profession to be a dime novelist or a ghost writer of love letters for scientists, especially such working on the field of bioequivalence or similar nonsens
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Sample Size "Efficiency" of Replicate CO vs. 2-way CO for NTID Sereng 2022-01-30 23:11
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Sample Size "Efficiency" of Replicate CO vs. 2-way CO for NTID ElMaestro 2022-01-30 23:50
- OTd_labes 2022-01-31 18:48
- Follow the guidance (if possible) Helmut 2022-01-30 23:52
- Follow the guidance (if possible) Sereng 2022-01-31 21:58
- Now I got it! Helmut 2022-01-31 23:53
- Follow the guidance (if possible) Sereng 2022-01-31 21:58
- Sample Size "Efficiency" of Replicate CO vs. 2-way CO for NTID ElMaestro 2022-01-30 23:50
Ing. Helmut Schütz