Manual reintegration! [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by H_Rotter – Germany, 2008-08-28 13:28 (6082 d 01:16 ago) – Posting: # 2269
Views: 23,695

Dear Jan & Ohlbe,

wonderful, thank you very much for your thoughtful comments! In my experience over-regulation leads to something which is similar to 'regression-to-the-mean' in statistics, namely 'regression-to-mediocricy'.
'Bad' analysts (not 'well trained' following Ohlbe's terminology) will not dare to reintegrate chromatograms any more; 'good' ones (or experienced, if you prefer) will reduce the number of reintegrations in an attempt to find a balance between additional workload and their professional knowledge.

IMHO, in any case the analytical 'quality' will decrease. The section should be deleted entirely - it's simply stupid.

Regards,
Hermann

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5