Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-11-19 17:22 (1277 d 12:02 ago) – Posting: # 22677
Views: 2,552

Hi ceylan,

❝ For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.


❝ For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?

❝ Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?


❝ And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?


I think the question is a little too general.
Sometimes regulators want a 95% CI other times they want a 90% CI.
Here's a case of a 95% CI being used.
Here's a case of 90% CI being used.

Whatever you do, if you need PD I recommend to go for a scientific advice. Ask about 90% vs 95% if there is nothing written in a guideline. Don't make assumptions and don't take chances.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,684 registered users;
169 visitors (0 registered, 169 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5