Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-11-19 16:22 (309 d 08:37 ago) – Posting: # 22677
Views: 859

Hi ceylan,

» For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.
» For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?
» Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?
» And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?

I think the question is a little too general.
Sometimes regulators want a 95% CI other times they want a 90% CI.
Here's a case of a 95% CI being used.
Here's a case of 90% CI being used.

Whatever you do, if you need PD I recommend to go for a scientific advice. Ask about 90% vs 95% if there is nothing written in a guideline. Don't make assumptions and don't take chances.

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,385 posts in 4,684 threads, 1,594 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 02:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You really don’t know what you don’t know until you write about it.
Then, everyone knows what you don’t know.    Rod Machado

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz